Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Advanced Academic Programs (AAP)
Reply to "Base Schools Sending Most Students to TJ"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Inescapable fact. "Base" school tells you the geography of the students. The wealthier areas have smarter kids. Now we can debate all day the root causes for that, but you can't deny the correlation.[/quote] ^this sums it up.[/quote] the wealthier areas have smarter kids - not so sure academically more advanced kids, sure. wow! what a revelation.[/quote] Why do you think that is? I mean, sure, kids who are in poverty are not going to do as well as kids who have a stable home and money for tutoring or whatever, but why would there be such a gap b/t financially stable kids at a school like West Springfield or Lake Braddock vs. financially stable kids at Langley/McLean/Oakton? Is it really about wealth? Is it that the parents of the Langley/McLean kids pour a lot more money into prep classes? Is it that the teachers have higher expectations and therefore bring kids up to a higher level? Is it that the wealthy professional parents at Langley/McLean types of schools really are smarter (thus resulting in their higher-paying jobs) and their kids ARE genetically smarter? Is it that the parents of the second-tier schools just aren't as intense about education? Once kids are in a financially stable home where they want for nothing -- what then is the difference b/t the schools with the most TJ kids (or SAT scores) and the schools where it isn't as high?[/quote] For better or worse, wealth CAN be correlated with intelligence. (Don't go off about trust-fund babies, etc. as those are not common situations.) So it's not surprising that those in the upper income bracket are more intelligent. It is also a fact that there is a genetic component to intelligence. So it's not at all surprising that the higher-income areas have kids who are likely just smarter. No, that's not saying all wealthy kids are smart or all poor people aren't. But let's not play the PC game of all people have the same potential but some are just disadvantaged and don't have good schools, etc. If you want intelligent kids, the best chance of that is if you are intelligent yourself. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics