Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "We used to count black Americans as 3/5 of a person. For Reparations give them 5/3 of the vote."
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Of course it's crazy. It offends the most basic principle of democracy: one person, one vote. [/quote] So does the Senate, which gives people from small states far more representation than those from large states. Abolish it. [/quote] No, that's designed as a balance of power which is a focal point of the founding fathers. That's also why those in the House are called Representatives.[/quote] There's no good reason to give people from Wyoming nearly [b]70 times[/b] more representation than people from California. That's an imbalance that was not contemplated when the Senate was established. [/quote] It was absolutely contemplated! I suggest you read about how our government was formed. Representation and balance of power were keys. And given how laws are passed there is no imbalance.[/quote] Okay. Please post a link indicating that someone in the 1700s contemplated that one state would be 70 times larger than another. I'll be happy read it. Thanks. [/quote] NP here. I think you need to go back to high school and learn a little in a basic government class. On second thought, you will probably be there in a few weeks. Forgive me for not recognizing that you have not had that high school government class yet. [/quote] You're not funny. Britain also used to have a legislative body that was not representive of the populace -- the House of Lords -- but it has correctly relegated it to a ceremonial/advisory role. The U.S. should do the same to its version of the House of Lords -- the Senate.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics