Reply to London and Paris or tour of Italy?

Forum Index » Travel Discussion

Reply to "London and Paris or tour of Italy?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote]
I echo Italy but I feel Italy requires a certain independence- like renting a car. If that's a stretch for you, then I would say Paris and London. [/quote]

I understand what you are saying, but there is plenty you can do in Italy without a car.  I've done both.  Countryside--a car is needed.  But, you can go lots of places without one: Venice, Florence, Rome, and lots of other less well known places.  You can also take a bus tour--which, I know, sounds awful to those who are veteran travelers.  But, it can be a great way to see the sights with little trouble.  Just find a tour that allows you time to roam on your own.  For seeing museums, etc, it can save you LOTS of time.  I l had driven a couple of times to Italy when I lived in Europe, but I also decided to take a tour to Rome because I didn't want to fool with all the logistical stuff.  It was a great way to go.  This tour did allow a lot of time on your own.

For first time travelers, I highly recommend a bus tour.

[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics