Reply to Please help me explain this to DS

Forum Index » Elementary School-Aged Kids

Reply to "Please help me explain this to DS"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]You don't need to explain the opposing point of view because it's nonsensical. All people should dress appropriately for their environment, and that's the purpose of a dress code. You're son is right. It's particularly foolish that the girls are protesting since the rule extends to males as well. [/quote]

What is inappropriate for a high school environment about shorts that are shorter than finger-tip length but still cover the underwear, the crotch, and the rear end?[/quote]

If the standard is only that it covers underwear and crotch, [b]why not just let them wear bikinis to school if they want[/b]? Part of school is preparing for involvement in society. That means dressing appropriately when necessary. You don't wear inappropriate attire to an office, or court, or school, or the doctor, or church, or any place such as those. You dress decently. And I wear shorts, I like shorts, but shorts that merely "cover the crotch" do not count as decent and show a level of disrespect for the school environment and any other place where they are not appropriate to be worn. Let your teen daughters wear them at their house, out with friends, in their free time. School isn't the place.[/quote]

Do bikinis these days cover the underwear, the crotch, and the rear end? The ones I see don't.

Again, shat is inappropriate for a high school environment about shorts that are shorter than finger-tip length but still cover the underwear, the crotch, [b]and the rear end[/b]?[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics