Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
College and University Discussion
Reply to "SLACs---good, bad and the ugly?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Harvard is not a small liberal arts college.[/quote] [b]Neither is Cal State Fullerton.[/quote] But it is a state school and the PP who mentioned it and Harvard was comparing SLACs and state schools.[/quote] [/b] Which makes no sense at all because the title of the thread is "SLACS - good, bad and the ugly". Harvard University and Cal State Fullerton are both large universities, so PPs comments make no sense in this thread at all.[/quote] OP's question was a comparison based on cost rather than size -- i.e. Is it worth paying for a SLAC when you could go to a state school? so CSUF made sense; Harvard didn't. Swarthmore would have sense (replacing Harvard) since the point the respondent was making is that there's no categorical answer -- it depends on the comparative quality of the specific state school and the specific SLAC.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
