Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
DC Public and Public Charter Schools
Reply to "By the numbers: A dispassioned evaluation of Hardy (compared to Deal and Wilson)"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous] Bloviating aside, this is all besides the main point. Hardy is already good enough for IB students if they actually look at the correct numbers (concerns about looking only at numbers notwithstanding). There are indications greater numbers of parents are realizing this and sending their children to Hardy. This makes the main point more obvious and, hence, makes coordination easier for those who continue to demand coordination. [/quote] I mean, that's not wrong -- but lots of parents *aren't* sending their kids to Hardy, too. So obviously there are other factors involved -- and you could quantify them if you wanted to (e.g. the perceived gain that comes from the contacts that you make in the private school system, as a PP mentioned). I mean, your point is that MC white kids will do okay academically in public school, right? That's not news; I assume parents who choose private have other motivations. And it's "perceptions and feelings" that are driving that. (AKA people are not perfect rational actors, which I think is one of the assumptions of GT, no?)[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics