Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Metropolitan DC Local Politics
Reply to "Muriel Bowser and Developers"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous] GGW is just a blog, I don't think they get any money from developers. Do you have any evidence? [/quote] No, she doesn't, because none exists. However, it is the only way the Committee of 100 types can justify the thought that reasonable people can come to difference conclusions than their own. There are plenty of societal and environmental reasons why there should be more affordable housing spread in the different corners of the city, why there should be good transportation options including more buses, streetcar, car sharing and other choices readily available, why there should be more mixed-use development on our main streets and more density focused near metro stations. However, these folks seem to think that free parking wherever and whenever they want it is a means to an end to oppose new development, new density and new transportation options. [/quote] Re: density near Metro stations, good in theory but not always in practice. Thanks God we have an historic district in Cleveland Park. Otherwise the area near the Metro would look like Van Ness today.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics