Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Founding Member of Charlie Hebdo Says Slain Editor "Dragged' Team to their Death"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous] Which is an application of France's LAWS and begs the question: [u][b]why didn't the terrorists sue in the COURTS instead of taking matters into their own hands? Or at least do some form of LEGAL passive resistance, which is also perfectly LEGAL in France.[/b][/u] France has LAWS exactly for this purpose. I don't know why this difference is so hard to understand. Every country sets parameters around free expression, including obscenity, nudity and hate speech. These parameters are highly unlikely to address everybody's pet concerns, instead they're some sort of middle ground arrived at through the ballot. If you llive in France, you abide by its anti-semitism LAWS (Coulibali) and you address your own concerns through France's LEGAl SYSTEM instead of taking matters into your own hands and killing people. If you think there should be an anti-Islamophobia LAW, then lobby for it. (Sorry for the caps, but I don't get why this distinction between LAWS vs. vigilante/mob justice is so hard to understand.)[/quote] The terrorists do not sue in the court of law, because they are not in the business of righting some political, legal, social, cultural wrong. Terrorism is a full-fledged business. Their economic (and political) agenda is to create disruption through terror and then to hide behind a cause as a lip service. This has made their leaders and puppet masters very rich. What purpose would it serve for the terrorists to actually solve ANY issues? Solving issues through legal or diplomatic means, means that they are out of business. They thrive on chaos. If they wanted to actually help the cause of muslims they would have gone and rescued the muslim girls who are being raped and abducted by Boka Haram. [/quote] Exactly[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics