Reply to Law school hook up culture?

Forum Index » Relationship Discussion (non-explicit)

Reply to "Law school hook up culture?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]The idea of the market value of women makes me want to upchuck. Revolting and a crick if sh-t.[/quote]

it isn't a woman only concept.

men have a market value too.

market value doesn't literally mean dollars and cents. it is a place holder of how competitive you are in the dating pool in relation to others.

If you don't think competition exists in the dating pool, you are deluding yourself.

It is better to get smart and educated so you can optimize your mating strategy over being naive. [/quote]
Your idea of SMV is so naive that you think competition rankings are defined by looks alone for women.

Are you familiar with the concept of assortative mating? If not, you should be.

An upper-class 6 woman is much more likely to marry an upper-class 8 man than a working-class 10 woman.  Men aren't stupid. They know beauty is a perishable asset while family standing, money and education are appreciating assets.  When a man is looking to marry, he is looking for a mother of his future children, meaning she should be good not just for fucking, but for raising children.  For this job, beauty is of limited utility. [/quote]

PP you are quoting. I NEVER said it was purely looks driven.

I'm keenly aware that isn't the case. MY persian FWB is a 8-9 hottie.

The girls I pursue relationships are 6/7 highly educated women that even if I have an oops baby with, i'll be able to put up with them long term and my kid will be semi smart since i believe intelligence is heritable.

SMV encompasses a host of factors, with each person assigning different weights. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics