Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Reply to "Congratulations Will and Jada Smith..."
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]You can comment on their work. It's unnecessary to comment on who they are as people.[/quote] Wrong. They don't just put out 'work'. They also did this interview, and showed their personalities. We get to comment. [/quote] I get what you're saying. Still I think it's one thing to criticize their words and another thing to label them "insufferable". That just seems mean-spirited. And a quick google search could result in them seeing some of the things posted here. What would they gain? I'm saying this because my instinct might initially be to mock them too, but I've realized it's just not right or fair or productive.[/quote] Oh it's certainly not productive, but who cares about right of fair? They're loudmouth celebrities, and we're anonymous commenters on the internet. This is how it goes these days. Also, haven't seen anyone in this thread be racist or vile or wish violence against them. People are just saying that they're obnoxious and pathetic, and you can't argue against that! [/quote] [b]You wouldn't say it to any kid you know (at least I hope not), so why do you feel this is okay?[/b] Kids say silly things. This is nothing new. These kids happen to be in the spotlight, but I don't think that gives anyone license to be cruel. I don't think we should do it to adult celebrities either, but at least they're adults. These are children. [/quote] I actually would, sort of, and I think their parents should have. If my kids are saying/doing things that are going to reflect badly on them I do take them aside and tell them how they are coming across. How blunt I am depends on the kid and the situation. I honestly have said "When you say things like that it makes you seem terribly arrogant. I know you want to come across as smart and capable, and you are both of those things, but when you say stuff like that, instead of making you look good the impression people are going to get is that you are acting as an insufferable know it all. Try saying something like _____ instead". I've told my kids that anything they do in public is fair game for public comment -- whether that be praise or ridicule -- and that I cannot control if a quote of something they said or a video/picture of something they did gets around school or ends up all over their friends' facebook pages. My kids aren't famous, so the odds of their potential stupidity going viral online are pretty low but we have had the "CNN test" in place in my extended family since before I was born and I see no reason not to caution them about the ease with which impressions can be skewed and stupidity can be memorialized. Surely these kids have had similar lessons, especially given their actual exposure to real media which, no matter what a child may think, is NEVER on the interviewee's side and is ALWAYS looking to make people look worse rather than better because drama sells. It's a very public interview to a major publication. Giving such a thing, assuming parental permission was granted for minors to do so, automatically makes the contents of the interview fair game for comments both positive and negative about the way the kids CHOSE to portray themselves. Even if the kids didn't realize how they were going to come across or didn't intend to give the impression they did, the parents should have retained enough control to not let this happen IF they are dissatisfied with the way their kids come across in interviews. Until the parents were confident the kids could give an interview where they would portray themselves in a positive light, they should have either declined the interview or been more involved in it. [b]My oldest once had to give an "interview" (really it was less than 2 minutes and they only used a quote or two) to a local paper about a service project she was involved with. We did several mock interviews coming up with questions and having her practice answers specifically emphasizing what she wanted to draw attention to and (thanks to one of DH's friends) pulled some examples of the specific reporter's previous work to see what sort of spin if any she usually put on her articles so that we could coach DD on how to work with it if necessary. Going into the interview DD knew approximately what to expect, and she had already packaged and vetted (and had vetted by us as her parents for final approval and by a trusted relative as a mentor) the message she wanted to send. [/b][b][i]All this for a small town newspaper in the Midwest before we moved here, and all for a tiny interview most people would probably never read with a high school student nobody outside of our small community had ever heard of.[/i][/b] Surely celebrities are able and willing to go to similar lengths to prepare for media exposure. Image management is very important, especially in their position. I don't think the critical commentary of anonymous strangers on the internet is likely to be helpful to the kids in the future, but it certainly is not inappropriate. If they do run across the negative feedback from their interview perhaps it will prompt them to reconsider how they are portraying themselves although I realize this is unlikely.[/quote] Oh my god, you sound [i]exhausting[/i]. I feel so, so sorry for your child(ren).[/quote] I'm sure she found it to be an exhausting 2.5 hours, but she concedes that it was worth it because the interview went brilliantly, she and her organization looked great, and years later she still uses a similar preparation strategy for interviews of various types. This was her first and she was nervous (she didn't know how long it was actually going to turn out to be or what it would be like until afterwards), so we believed the best way to combat nerves was for her to be confident that she would be successful, and the best way to do that was to be prepared. We took a similar tactic, although a longer period of preparation, when this same DD was interviewing for a full ride scholarship to university. Total value around 100k so we told her to treat the application and interview process like a full-time job. In this day and age your public image is enduring and important -- if you're publicly putting your name to something or if you have to make an important first impression you'd better be prepared to do what's necessary to make sure it turns out right.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics