Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Money and Finances
Reply to "What is your definition of Middle class, upper middle class and lower middle class"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous] I will respond to your three responses below. Thanks for taking the time to share your thoughts. 1. Yes, money and education are proxies. By themselves, they likely provide necessary but not sufficient public and private goods to nourish a healthy and vibrant society. Having a society that is institutionally designed to prize just money and education is in my opinion hollow. If what you propose is true, then the country should just be a plutocracy. I don't think that was the design envisioned in the American experiment of governance.[/quote] The evidence is contrary to your claim that money and education are poor/hollow proxies by themselves. The the strength of the US comes from our system of laws and government that effectively nurture the right kind of money and education. Whereas people in a corrupt country may get rich mostly through criminal acts, embezzlement or abuse of the rights of others, people in the US mostly get rich through hard work, taking on well calculated risk, and conducting their business in a legal and ethical manner. Similarly, the US system of education is of very high practical quality and our network of public and private colleges/universities are sought after for the prestige they bestow on their alumni. The value of these degrees are directly the result of the rigorous and high quality curriculum delivered by these institutions. In short, in the US, with minor exceptions, there is a strong correlation between rich and well educated, and being a person with integrity, character, and a sense of contributing to a greater common good. The important distinction here is that these are natural and organic manifestations, rather than artificial ideological mantras that we've seen fail miserably in history. [quote=Anonymous]2. I didn't say that integrity, character and caring for others and self were more important than other things, but that they are necessary components in good institutional design that are less and less valued by current US society relative to money and (in pedigree obsessed DMV) education. Just because it is more difficult to measure, and i suspect, to show off to others, as well as less remunerative in a lot of cases, it shouldn't be ignored. Certainly i didn't say that money and education are inherently hollow. It is the pursuit of these by society without good judgement, character, integrity and caring that is hollow.[/quote] Okay, thanks for clarifying. I read your initial post differently. I would offer that the reason money and diploma are offered as proxies because they are good quality proxies for how well a person is doing in life as I argued above, and also because these are metrics that have specific and well understood measurements. There are many different ways that someone can exhibit integrity, character, and caring for others, but it's rather difficult to measure these traits directly, much less put them into a table for analysis. [quote=Anonymous] 3. I think you're arguing a straw man here because i never suggested that ideals should be substituted for pragmatism. Money and education again are necessary but not sufficient. Models of socioeconomic status presented here show dimensions only along money and education. That is an institutional design that herds people into pursuing those stated goals. Many people will realize that they need more to be fulfilled in their lives, but the way that they actualize this won't be along social norms because there is no explicit prescription for it. [/quote] The pursuit of money and education in the US occurs within a frame work that rewards integrity, character, and caring for others. The American model is that you work hard, treat others fairly, care for your family and community, and you will be successful. In other words, these characteristics make up the framework within which the pursuit of wealth and education take place. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics