Reply to Any regrets about not accepting TJ admission?

Forum Index » Advanced Academic Programs (AAP)

Reply to "Any regrets about not accepting TJ admission?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]PP here.  On closer reading, it appears that 1/3 of the students were in remedial classes for math or science.  So I suppose math could have been half of that.  But still, kids need remediation in science too?  Why even have a STEM magnet?[/quote]

The kids are getting extra help to receive grades of [b]B or above in TJ version of Algebra II[/b] in order to maintain the mandatory minimum 3.0 unweighted GPA (kids will be put on probation if they receive 3.3 unweighted GPA and will be encouraged to seek "remediation if they appear to be headed for a grade of [b]B or B-[/b] for a course and will be forced out if the overall unweighted GPA does not meet the 3.0 unweighted GPA). We are not talking about the typical "remediation" for kids receiving or headed toward D or F. There is a fundamental difference between getting extra help because a student is headed for a grade of B and getting help because a student is failing miserably and headed for D/F. "Remediation' is offered only because the school has an obligation to help even those students doing relatively well (B) since B (83 to 86) is not acceptable at TJ whereas 83 to 86 in a math class for any other students in fcps would be more than aceptable.

These kids that get kicked out for academic reasons move to their base schools and typically end up in the top 5-10% of their class. That should tell you something about the quality of students at TJ. Please keep these in mind before wondering why there is remediation at TJ. There should not even be a minimum 3.0 unweighted GPA requirement in the first place which puts additional pressure on the kids. The students should decide for themselves if they want to move back to their base school.

[/quote]

My DC and his friends (all math kids) had a relatively easy time in Algebra II,  with all of them getting A's.   Obviously, TJ feels this is a core course and the basis for much higher math, so if they have a hard time getting an A in this entry-level math course for TJ, perhaps that is a sign they need help.  I also have no problem with an unweighted 3.0 as a requirement.  Isn't that a B- or C average?  Surely these brilliant kids can manage that.  If they can't, I'm sure there are others who can.  If they don't want pressure, perhaps they shouldn't be there?[/quote]

1.[b] TJ's Algebra II is much tougher than base schools' Algebra II.
[/b]2. There is no grade inflation at TJ unlike some other schools and obviously not all of the students in a given class will receive A or B+.
3. 3.0 unweighted GPA is B not B- or C.
4. The minimum unweighted 3.0 GPA requirement was instituted several years ago and it wasn't there when the TJ was established in 1986.[/quote]

1.  Son and friends were at TJ and had no problem with Algebra II.  
2.  Depends on the school, class and teacher.
3.  3.0 unweighted GPA is a B.   Kids who are smart enough to get into TJ should be able to get all B's.  I mean PE was an easy A even for my nonathletic kid.  Presumably, a kid brilliant enough to get into TJ could manage at least one other A in a core course.  
4.  The 3.0 rule wasn't needed when the school was established because it accepted the kind of math and science kids for which it was created.  The requirement was instituted after too many people with no real interest or aptitude for math and science were let in, some legacies because a sibling had done well there, some athletic, because administrators at TJ thought that would be cool, and even, if memory serves, one girl who was a model.  Not that that meant she wasn't smart, but I think it was part and parcel of TJ becoming too full of itself and wanting to be something it wasn't.  They lost the plot.  The 3.0 rule was one attempt to get the school back on track.  [/quote]

My son had no problem with Algebra II at TJ as well and in fact he had the highest score in his class. However, that is not the point. The point is the 3.0 unweighted GPA requirement and the side effects that such requirement create. It led to "artificial" remediation for B students, forces TJ kids to focus too much on GPA and take AP courses they may not be genuinely interested in instead of taking post AP courses with less weigting or other interesting TJ unique science courses with less or no weigting which goes against the notion of encouraging students to pursue their interest and passion in stem.

In addition, there are TJ kids who excel in Varsity Math Team and excel at National Math Tournaments who do not necessarily excel in traditional math courses (they are different types of math and it is counter-intuitive but happens), and there are Intel/Siemens semifinalists who are not necessarily maintaining high GPAs since they love engaging in original research spending lot of time on research but not necessarily grade obsessed etc. Are these students supposed to go back to base schools if they have 3.2 -3.3 unweighted GPAs? Wasn't TJ created for these types of students who are passionate about math/science and think outside the box and not necessarily obsessed about GPA or college admissions? These are more complicated issues and not as simple as low GPA means not good in math and science. In fact, [b]it's possible to game the GPA system where non-stem kids can have higher overall GPA by getting As in non-stem courses and just taking the bare minimum requirements for stem courses (e.g. only go up to calculus AB in senior year while taking course such as AP Psychology, AP Music, AP European history etc. which are all 5.0 courses). [/b]Does it make sense for a student who places in top 20 at the national math tournament to be in "remediation" if the kid is getting B in math/science courses?

The bottom line is the admissions system should be revised and the 3.0 rule should be re-examined.[/quote]

+100[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics