Reply to Spinoff of suit for interview -- pantyhose?

Forum Index » Jobs and Careers

Reply to "Spinoff of suit for interview -- pantyhose?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]It's absolutely disheartening to see young women forgo hose -- bare legs are really distasteful, interview or day-to-day. We really need to turn the tide back to wearing them. They're sexy, too.[/quote]

I'm guessing you're a man whose never had a yeast infection or a UTI.[/quote]

I wear hose, and I don't get yeast infections or UTIs.

I don't care about being sexy.  I think hose (sheer, not thick clunky hose) are necessary with a skirt suit.  Not wearing hose with a skirt suit is like a guy not wearing socks with a suit.   It's tacky and unprofessional.

It's fine to not wear hose with a sundress or a spring skirt.  But if you are going to wear a suit, wear hose.  I also think that if you wear a pant suit, you should wear trouser (the dressy sheer kind or very thin dressy kind) socks.  But I think bare feet in dress shoes is tacky.

And lest people suggest I'm tacky, I think men should wear appropriate trouser socks with suits.

[/quote]

It's fine if you think it's tacky, but it's just not required by convention any more. I have seen many women of all ages and positions with bare legs at every sort of professional event. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics