Reply to The education miracle in Finland

Forum Index » DC Public and Public Charter Schools

Reply to "The education miracle in Finland"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]There are a couple points that are very important and are being missed here.

1. The teachers are highly trained with masters degrees.  The teaching programs/colleges are tough to get into and have a stringent grading system.  This is because they have to know exactly how to teach courses, such as math, meaning they have to be at least good at the subject.

This is not the case here.  Most courses here deal with classroom management and psychology.  Not saying those are not important, but getting into a teaching degree program is not difficult and teachers don't have to have a deep understanding of math to teach it here.  (Oh the mistakes I've seen, but the teachers don't even catch them)

2. Historically there has been no "gifted" program.  The kids that excel in math stay in the same class as their peers and often end up assisting them.  There are some now, but it's not prevalent.

Imagine telling AAP parents here, that their child doesn't need to be in a special classroom, at a center surrounded by peers of similar ability.  That they can succeed in, gasp, Gen. Ed. classes.   There would likely be county wide protests and petitions.

Here's a short video that provided a decent summary.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rlYHWpRR4yc

[/quote]

Agree with your first point - not to knock pedagogy but we have put pedagogy ahead of deep subject matter expertise, which I think is a mistake.  Subject matter experts who are passionate about the subject area, who've had some incidental study of pedagogy are probably going to do better than people with an education degree, who only have a cursory knowledge of the subject matter.  The proof is in the pudding:  For all of this focus on classroom management, pedagogy and psychology that our public education machine has put on teachers, they don't seem to be doing a good job of it here in DCPS - with lagging performance in the basics like reading and math, not to mention poor behavior and poorly managed classrooms.  I think we hit a point of diminishing returns, and the pendulum needs to swing back in favor of deep knowledge of the subject matter, as happens in Finland.

As for the second point, G&T programs have been around in the US public school system for 150 years and most of the country has G&T programs.  I also do not necessarily agree that it's the job of an advanced learner to assist and tutor the less proficient students.  I think it's great for them to do it on a voluntary basis but I don't think it should be an expectation.  How is that fair to the advanced student?[/quote]

Not the PP but I think it is more that having a mix of abilities benefits everyone. There is an incredible amount of learning that comes from teaching. For a student to know something is one level of learning, to be able to teach those concepts to another and to teach them in different ways takes the 'teacher's' learning to a whole new level. It doesn't just benefit the learner. [/quote]

Sounds good on paper but it ends up being the advanced learners who have to do a lot more work, who have more stress and pressure, and who get the added piece of trying to explain concepts to others, whereas the less proficient students coast along for the ride.  Maybe the less proficient will pick a few things up but I certainly wouldn't pin my strategy and hopes on a 10 year old being an effective instructor to other students.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics