Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
DC Public and Public Charter Schools
Reply to "Disadvantaged children can hurt achievement of others in their classrooms"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][b]Countries that have over all high achievement focus resources on poor kids.[/b] The American system distinguishes itself for how much more money and resources it redirects towards already well off children. Systems based on real estate taxes are going to be inherently unequal. Sure some kids will make it out but a lot of capacity is still squandered because rich people will focus on their already advantaged kids. I probably would also if I were a rich, but from a macro level it sure does not make sense. [/quote] Do you have stats/specifics to back this up? Because most of the Asian countries that have high achievement rates don't focus on poor kids. In fact, most of the really poor kids don't go to school (at least from what I've read). Other countries that have high achievement actually don't have the gaps in wealth and poverty that we have. I'm talking about Scandinavian countries. They also don't have the huge ethnic, racial and cultural differences that we have and very restrictive immigration laws. Other European countries heavily track the kids. So from a young age, kids are steered in a certain direction. I don't think you are correct about the American system. In a lot of cases, EXTRA funds are devoted to poor performing schools. But it has been to no avail. I don't know what the solution is. I don't think segregation is the answer, so OP and some of the other PPs on here strike me as just flat out racist, elitist and bigoted. I do think that we would be better off if states ran schools instead of counties/districts/cities. If the schools were run at the state level, teachers could be shifted around easier to help alleviate over crowding or talent drain. But beyond that, I don't know what the solution is. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics