Reply to NYT Investigation of BENGHAZI

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "NYT Investigation of BENGHAZI"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=jsteele][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]This is to try and get Presidential numbers up, nothing more. [/quote]
Yes, the New York Times, a 162 year old newspaper qwith a long history of integrity is just a propaganda front for the President, and has always helped the President, even when he is violating the law, as shown in [url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pentagon_Papers]1971[/url]. Some random blog with an admitted bias is a much better source.[/quote]

Interesting that Dianne Feinstein doesn't agree with their conclusions:

http://thehill.com/blogs/global-affairs/middle-east-north-africa/195327-feinstein-rejects-nyt-on-benghazi

Que a copy and paste job of her spokesman immediately downplaying the plain and simple fact that She. Does. Not. Agree. With. The NYT...[/quote]

Feinstein appears to be an idiot and and uninformed idiot at that:

"She also disputed the notion that the Sept. 11, 2012, assault evolved from a protest against the video, which was widely disseminated by Islamic clerics shortly before the attack.

'It doesn’t jibe with me,' she said."

She chairs the Senate Intelligence Committee. She should tell us what the evidence says, not what "jibes" with her.
[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics