Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Jobs and Careers
Reply to "Moving some federal functions to other places in the U.S."
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Feds don't like it but many would move for their jobs. They prefer to have "face-time" with others in Washington. I think a department move elsewhere is usually shortsighted. In addition, there is value to having agencies easily identifiable to visitors to Washington ~ they walk down the mall, they see the name on the building "The Department of Agriculture", "The Department of Housing and Urban Development" It is their federal city.[/quote] Alas, many Americans will have neither the time, means, nor priority to visit Washington, DC, in their lifetime. In that sense, they would be better served by seeing that the "Department of Education" is located in their home state, or that the "Department of Housing and Urban Development" is only a three-hours drive from their hometown. People will only prefer "face-time" with others in Washington if they perceive that government power, wealth, influence, and spending continues to grow, aggregate, and amass in the Washington, DC area, as it has by leaps and bounds in the past 25 years. If you disperse this region's concentration of power and influence and policymaking to the different parts of our country, then federal employees will be happy to serve and work there -- seeing no one place as the most important, elite, or worthy of their "face time" -- which is as it should be.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics