Reply to If 30% of kids in a school qualify for "gifted" why don't they address it in the home school?

Forum Index » Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)

Reply to "If 30% of kids in a school qualify for "gifted" why don't they address it in the home school?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous] Is it even developmentally appropriate for kids in K-5 to spend an hour-plus of the integrated learning block directing their own learning? (Aside from the 20 minutes their small group is with the teacher.) Most of them twiddle their thumbs, doodle, chat with friends and end up getting yelled at for being off task. It takes a truly gifted [b]teacher[/b] to be able to effectively instruct the 4-5 kids in small group learning while keeping an eye on the rest of the class to make sure they are behaving. I think curriculum 2.0 has completely unrealistic expectations of what teachers can accomplish when they are the only adult in the room with 20+ students. Or maybe Starr simply realizes that the kids who suffer are those who will meet the standard no matter what happens in the classroom, so they're not a priority.
[/quote]

I don't know. I know that it worked with the teacher for my first-grader last year. And she was a good teacher, but I don't think she was an exceptional teacher (unless most teachers are not good teachers). I also know that, at this same school, before Curriculum 2.0, children worked in differentiated small groups in the same classroom. I also know that we did this when I was in elementary school, around the Pleistocene Era (actually the 1970s).

Did you have a child with this same teacher before Curriculum 2.0? If so, how did that compare? [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics