Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Advanced Academic Programs (AAP)
Reply to "Washington Post article on FCPS' AAP report"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I agree with you about many options for challenge and enrichment, and taking a longer and broader view. But I simply don't believe that WISC testers for AAP appeal should be limited to school psychologists, who were likely already part of the GBRS team and may have preconceived notions about the child. [/quote] That would depend on the school. The team listed on my DC1's GBRS consisted of the classroom teacher, the AART and the assistant principal, not the school psychologist. In the AAP office's Parent Information Packet, the school psychologist isn't even listed as someone who might be on the local screening committee except perhaps in the catchall "other specialists as needed". A school psychologist might have preconceived notions about a particular child (and probably would for my DC2), but it most likely wouldn't be from the GBRS.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
