Reply to Washington Post article on FCPS' AAP report

Forum Index » Advanced Academic Programs (AAP)

Reply to "Washington Post article on FCPS' AAP report"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote]Or perhaps it will be offered on a sliding fee scale. I don't think FCPS is that far along with the details yet.[/quote]

Yes, I imagine it would be easy to use free and reduced lunch standards to determine which families would also qualify to have testing done for free or at a reduced fee since FCPS already has this information. 
I would like to see FCPS handle WISC testing: it would lead to a more level playing field. [/quote]

In a way I don't like the idea of having the testing done at school. Some people have felt that their child's GBRS was unfairly assigned, and this would typically have been done by a team including the school psychologist, at least at our school. If there is a team of people at the school believing that a DC is not qualified and should be kept out of AAP, I would not want someone from that team administering my child's WISC, if I were the parent. I'm not sure if there are any judgment calls involved that could influence the result of the WISC, but even a severe, negative attitude I would think could cause a DC to stumble and not perform his/her best. I've read that WISC results can vary by even as much as 30 points on different days under different conditions (e.g., tired vs. not tired). To me it isn't hard to imagine that the tester's attitude and demeanor could play a role. At different times with different people I have felt that I've said insightful things (with positive, uplifting people) or a series of dumb things (with critical, condescending people) as a result of how the interaction seemed.

If the school-administered WISC turned out to be low, a parent might always wonder why and whether the result was valid. Having testing done at a different school might help, but there might always be a suspicion of some type of FCPS collusion. A more objective outside party seems better to me. It sounds like that option would be eliminated if all testing is supposed to be from a consistent source. [/quote]

The FCPS comment to the GMU recommendation actually suggests both school psychologists and an approved list of testers:

[quote]FCPS plans to explore several options to include creation of summer testing clinics by FCPS school psychologists and creating a list of approved external psychologists for individual testing[/quote][/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics