Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Kids With Special Needs and Disabilities
Reply to "Anyone else think that speech therapy is a sham?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]I think I am going to be the one person here to agree with OP--not that speech therapy is a "sham," because I don't think that's exactly what she was trying to say, but that in very very young children, it's often of limited use or no use at all. My son started speech therapy at around 20 months and frankly, it felt largely like a waste of time until he was about 3. At that point, we really saw a change in his ability to concentrate, to work on articulation (he initially had a significant delay in expressive speech, and later a delay in articulation), and to really benefit from the services provided. DS is now 4 and still in speech therapy but doing great. It's unquestionably helping him at this point. I have real doubts about whether it helped at a younger age, and I don't think this was the fault of the therapists. Now, I would be wary of making a blanket statement and saying that speech therapy is useless for every single 18-month-old who qualifies. There could be different drivers of the speech delay, and for example, if a child has feeding issues that are a component I think SLPs can work on those at younger ages. And as a pp said, speech delays can be an indicator of broader developmental issues, so there's a potential benefit to being on an SLP's radar who may be watching for those. But a lot of the activities for expressive speech delays, such as blowing bubbles, encouraging different sounds, etc. are really things that parents can easily be trained to do in a session or two. We have a younger child and have decided that if she seems delayed in speech we are not going to have her assessed as early as we did for DS. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics