Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "There are no death panels?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=takoma]The wealthy have always received better care than the poor. That will probably remain true. However, a neutral panel, even one composed of government bureaucrats, may even the playing field. As several PP's have said, as long as resources are limited, some will be denied care. To blame the panel for those, without giving credit for the fact that more people may live because of the panel, is grossly misleading.[/quote] The government has no business in health care. Period. They don't get to decide who lives and who dies in this regard. That's not their function by law. Even the playing field sounds an awful lot like share the wealth. Disgusting that those who pay the bulk of the care for others will be the ones denied care.[/quote] I think it's disgusting you apparently think organs should be auctioned to the highest bidder. And since most people in this country have private insurance I'm offended at your sense of entitlement that the wealthy somehow are paying for the healthcare of others.[/quote] What I'm saying is you don't dumb down healthcare in a country to make it accessible to all. You don't cripple it. Two tiers of service is used in a lot of countries and the wealthy DO get better care. But people like you would scream "It's not FAIR". If most people in this country have private insurance, then there was no need for Obamacare. I thought the premise for that was SO many were uninsured?[/quote] I have no idea on earth what "dumbing down healthcare" has to do with a rational policy on allocating organs for transplant. You do understand that there aren't enough organs, and that these organs don't come with instructions on who should get them? It in no way "cripples" healthcare to have a system that allocates those organs according to a set of medical criteria, rather than accordingly to whoever can pay the most for them. Also, can you really not understand that if 85% of Americans have health insurance, that still leaves 47 million Americans without health insurance? [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics