Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Bonds vs Mara?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=jsteele][quote=takoma]Based on this poll, the 2011 special election, and general feelings, my guess is that either Frumin or Silverman has a very low chance of winning as the race stands, maybe 5 or 10%. That's chance of winning, not percentage of vote. If one pulled out (quickly) and endorsed the other, I think the remaining one would have support pretty close to Bonds and Mara, so they'd have nearly equal chances to win, say 30%. If the two were to do a coin toss to choose one to drop out, they would have equal chances to get that 30% probability, so each would have a 15% chance. From a strategic point of view, the coin toss is a better strategy for each of them, and I think they are nuts not to do it. The factor I am omitting, of course, is the public's reaction, especially their supporters. Would people see it as an indication that they were not serious, or would most people understand it as a reasonable move by each one of them to enhance the probability of election? Or do you all just think I'm nuts?[/quote] I'm a bit shocked that you would base this post on the poll which had Silverman and Mara tied. As I've said before in this thread, I think the suggestion that this is a "Bonds vs Mara" election is a fallacy. Of course Bonds and Mara want you to believe this because it suits their purposes. Of course the Washington Post -- which has endorsed Mara in four elections -- wants you to believe this because it fits its purpose as well. It is also a mistake to read too much into the 2011 election. In 2011, Mara did not face strong opposition in Ward 3. He received nearly half the votes in that ward -- 4091. That's out of a total of 11851 votes he received city-wide. Frumin could easily take a large chunk out of that. Really, for Mara to have any chance at all, he needs voters to abandon Frumin. Hence, the constant flow of anti-Frumin posts in this forum originating in the Mara camp. If you wanted to portray the election as Bonds vs Frumin-Mara-Silverman (just putting the names alphabetical) I might agree. But, I don't believe there is sufficient evidence to declare this a Bonds vs. Mara election. So, any coin toss needs to include Mara. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics