Reply to More evidence that 2.0 and Starr is backward looking

Forum Index » Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)

Reply to "More evidence that 2.0 and Starr is backward looking "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I am ok with 2.0.  I don't remember learning fractions in 2nd grade, so I'll consider that my 7 year old is learning fractions to be a bonus.[/quote]

China and Europe must be laughing their arses off at how behind our curriculum now is.  Unless they too recently revamped to massively slow down, cover less topics, and teach to the bottom.[/quote]

2.0 is terrible for the kids who really love math and would have been the ones in the advanced math under the old curriculum. I agree with making  sure that the kids are getting a good foundation, but my first grader loves math and is bored in class. Like i do, he has thatbkind f a mind. Once taught he just gets it- he wamts to do multiplication and division. He hasn't learn one thing in math this year that he couldn't do by October. I am teaching him at home the things that my older child did in first grade when she was given 2 nd grade math-- 
I am looking for math camps for next summer-- ridiculous.[/quote]

We are participating in Dr. Li's math english this summer.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics