Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Schools and Education General Discussion
Reply to "Anyone have a negative outcome with jr kumon/kumon?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Cooperative learning is oxymoron. The kid has to be able to do the work independently before he can collaborate on something. It only sounds good at first.[/quote] I may be an outlier, but I don't know any highly successful people who don't learn cooperatively. That is the essense of being a senior executive to me. You work with others to tackle problems that lack simple correct/incorrect answers. You influence the motivation and desires of others to achieve shared goals. Those involved in corporate management, law, government, and politics take this for granted. Even most science/tech types work within the context of a large organizations that require cooperative learning. How many CEOs are the technical expert in their firm? So for me, sending my DC to a school that cares about things like cooperative learning is a way to make sure he doesn't end up stuck in a middle management cubicle.[/quote] What you are talking about is collaboration and team work, not cooperative learning. This is a good post from the blog out in left field. According to WSJ, the best way for a boss to increase the group's productivity is to teach the group member more productive skills. Monday, October 29, 2012 Real-world group work One of the justifications given by today's educators for making students spend so much of their days working in groups is that it will prepare them for today's cooperative workplace environments. As in so many other ways, today's educators assume that the relevant classroom dynamics mimic those of the real world. Real-world workplace cooperation bears little ressemblance to what happens in classrooms. Today's prefered teacher-assigned, mixed-ability classroom groupings look nothing like groupings of professionals collaborating with related professionals. In most workplace collaborations, most of the work is divvied up and done separately by individuals. And often the groups are at least somewhat hierarchical, with professionally-trained leaders with significant influence over how cooperative and productive the group is. Here are some findings reported in a recent Wall Street Journal article: Bosses matter a lot, according to a study of a large technology firm whose operations, closely monitored by computer, provided ready measures of productivity. Going from a boss in the bottom 10% of quality to one in the top 10% improved productivity among the supervised employees by as much as adding another worker to a nine-member team. Going from a boss in the bottom 10% of quality to one in the top 10% improved productivity among the supervised employees by as much as adding another worker to a nine-member team. More surprising, the boss made his or her biggest contribution not by motivating workers but by teaching more productive skills. [Boldface mine.] So much for motivational cheer leading--at least in the workplace. And, given that the closest thing classrooms have to bosses are teachers, there may be something suggestive here about how teachers can help students become more productive.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics