Reply to Baby boomers ruined America

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Baby boomers ruined America"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]11:38 poster here.

Let me clarify, I don't hate Boomers.  My parents are Boomers, and they have had their share of hardship.

That said, my parents are the first to say that a lot has gone wrong on their generation's watch.  For example, the whole McMansion thing was primarily *started* under the Boomers.

I would also say that many Boomers have suffered from the elimination of pensions, but it's also primarily Boomers who did the eliminating (i.e. Boomers started the move toward 401(k)s and eliminating defined-benefit pensions as well as breaking unions).

I know I'm not explaining this well, but my point is that resentment is directed at Boomers because a lot of these big changes happened under their watch.  That's not to say that those changes didn't and don't also hurt Boomers.

And yes, even the housing bubble.  Boomers were in the leadership positions and in charge of the big banks when all of this started in the early 2000s.  That's not to solely responsible.  My point was a lot happened under their watch.  No GenXer or younger was in charge of a lending institution in 2003.  No GenXer or younger was in a position of power to determine housing policy in 2003.  But of course, as real estate agents, loan officers, et cetera, GenXers and younger were still involved.  But they weren't at the top.

In fact, most GenXers and younger were buying when housing prices were already inflated.  They weren't/aren't the ones who came out on top of that pyramid.  That's my point.[/quote]Wow. You really need a good course in research methods. You argue that the variable that explains all these problems is the generation to which various people belonged?!!!??  That's like me saying that Gen Xers and Millenials are responsible for all the mass school shootings because it is younger men who have committed them.

Seriously, pp, I usually try to avoid harsh judgments of people who seem to be trying to sort things out but you really have a problem understanding the difference between causation and correlation.  And as I mentioned earlier, while you're trying to pin the blame on a whole generation, the financial industry will go on trying to avoid regulation so they can rake in the profits during the next bubble and laugh all the way to the bank. And by that time your generation will be in charge! And you know who I'll blame? Greedy people in the financial industry because they will be the ones to blame. Maybe lots of them will happen to be from your generation but I am smart enough to know that that is not the thing that explains their behavior.

BTW, I never had a McMansion, never wanted one, and I know lots of boomers who feel the same way.  But go on, just assign blame to a whole generation.  You'll make the financial industry very happy.[/quote]

You know, while you say I need a course in research methods, you need a course in reading comprehension.  I NEVER said that the Boomers are to BLAME for it.  I said it happened under their watch (while they were the ones in positions of power).

To follow your example, no Generation X and the Millenial generation is not to blame for mass shootings BUT it is primarily GenX and Millenials who make up the people committing them!  The cause is more complex.

And my post, by the way, was trying to explain why people have the resentment toward Boomers (the appearance of it -- that these problems emerged when Boomers were at their peak).

But obviously, you didn't read my posts carefully or my point went over your head.  You seem extremely reactive and over defensive.

My parents (Boomers) never had a McMansion either.  But they'll admit that the McMansion fad began with their generation.  It's not to say there aren't other factors that set the scene for that or that every Boomer is to blame and every Boomer had/wanted a McMansion.  The 2-car family also emerged while the Boomers were at their peak.  But there are tons of reasons why (more women working, et cetera).  An unintended consequence was that what happened is as more families had dual incomes, the cost of housing and everything else rose to a level that now all of that seems to require dual incomes.  It's not necessarily the Boomers' fault.  But the change happened with the Boomer generation, and there are consequences for families today (i.e. with my mother's generation, for most -- not all -- middle class women, they had a choice to stay at home to raise their kids or work, but really, now, most middle class -- truly middle class, not DC middle class -- families *need* two incomes in order to afford a house.)

Again, none of this stuff is solely the fault of the Boomers.  But a lot of these changes happened with the Boomers.   [/quote]

"Under their watch" means "while they were responsible".  You did blame them.  Either that or you do not understand the term.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics