Reply to SWS - as an IB School? L-T prospects?

Forum Index » DC Public and Public Charter Schools

Reply to "SWS - as an IB School? L-T prospects?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]In truth, the number of quality early childhood spots is basically the same given that Peabody was able to expand.  And the cluster never really had claim to SWS elementary - the Cluster elementary is Watkins.  What is odd to me is that there is no proximity preference for SWS and Logan.  I'm not saying it has to be a huge area, but the idea that the neighbors should deal with the downsides of colocation next to the school without any upside is not a good one.  One point of correction - Prospect was a school for persons with disabilities.  [b]The fact that Prospect was citywide is not a real comparison - students were placed there based on their IEP. [/b] The only other citywide elementary school is Logan.

[/quote]

The point is really that LT neighbors had no more right to Prospect than anyone else before, so there's no change in having no more right to it now.  Similarly, LT neighbors dealt with the traffic of a city-wide school and the noise from city-wide children before, so there's no change in dealing with that now.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics