Reply to State set to keep MS math minutes requirement that will likely cut electives (but delaying it a year)

Forum Index » Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)

Reply to "State set to keep MS math minutes requirement that will likely cut electives (but delaying it a year)"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Despite all the opposition, MSDE appears to be doubling down on keeping the middle school 60-daily-minutes-of-math requirement, although they are at least planning on delaying it a year (starting in fall 2028 rather than fall 2027.)  See [url=https://www.marylandpublicschools.org/stateboard/documents/edpolicycommittee/20260618/comprehensive-math-policy-and-secondary-math-program-a.pdf]here[/url] (page 21-22 and page 47)-- the committee will vote on it this Thursday and then the full board will likely vote next Tuesday to put it out for public comment, before finalizing it in July.

However, I suspect MCPS will go ahead with implementing it in the 2027-2028 school year anyway because Central Office wants to get all middle schools and high schools on the same schedule starting in fall 2027 and they're not going to want to change the schedules a second time in 2028.  My guess is that unless MSDE repeals the requirement, MCPS will probably go with a 6-period middle school schedule with only one elective starting in 2027 (or some similar change that also results in just one elective per year in MS), and they will probably announce it by this fall at the earliest to give middle schools enough time to prep for the change.  So unless MSDE repeals this in the next few months, it may well be too late to change anything at MCPS.

It is very frustrating.  I was hoping the state would relent on this requirement for 60 minutes of math daily in middle school (which no other state does) after all the powerful testimony they've received from teachers of electives, social studies, and science regarding the harmful impacts of such a requirement in middle school.  Apparently they are too stubborn to do so.  At this point I think people who care about this need to focus hard on expressing our alarm to state legislators and asking them to push MSDE to roll this back (plus make clear they will consider overturning this in law next year if MSDE doesn't change course.)

You can also e-mail State Board of Ed members before the votes-- [url=https://www.marylandpublicschools.org/stateboard/pages/members.aspx]here is the full list[/url], and the Montgomery County members are: peggy.carr [at] maryland.gov, samir.paul [at] maryland.gov, and nicole.murraylewis [at] maryland.gov  (who's apparently a history teacher at Blake, if anyone knows her personally and can appeal to her directly on this topic)-- and/or sign up to testify at next Tuesday's state Board of Ed meeting (in person, virtually, or through written testimony, although I think the written testimony generally gets ignored): [url]https://www.marylandpublicschools.org/stateboard/pages/publiccomment.aspx
[/url]
(And then of course folks should weigh in through whatever "public comment" process they put out there over the next few weeks-- but there are a bunch of other revisions to the policy that will be part of that as well, and folks shouldn't have any illusions that "public comment" alone will get this repealed.)[/quote]

I think MCPS will gladly take the extra year to figure out any 60-minute math mandate for MS.  That said, such a mandate for all students at that level is folly, and MSDE should adopt a more nuanced approach to ensuring MS math success, one that recognizes the limitations and impact of period scheduling.

[b]I don't think MCPS needs to have MS and HS on the same schedule.  Where did you see that?[/b]  If that was the case and MS needed to go to 6 periods, then HS also goes to 6 periods?  I mean, they really should be embracing a uniform 8-period block schedule with one period allowed, but not required, to be study hall to facilitate more meaningful magnets and the like.[/quote]

MCPS presented the plan to have a single MS schedule (and a single HS schedule) in SY 2027-2028 at the Board work session in early June. Maybe it will get moved back by a year if the state delays the requirement, but it’s definitely planned.

“What we anticipate for 2027–2028 and Beyond
● Standardized High School Schedule to meet
cross-school academic needs
● Standardized Middle School Schedule to meet
State math requirement”

See slide 20 in the BOE presentation: https://go.boarddocs.com/mabe/mcpsmd/Board.nsf/files/DUQRCG6D5696/$file/Leveling%20Up%202026-2027%20and%20Beyond%20260604%20PPT%20REV.pdf[/quote]

This sounds like they’re will need more teachers to work at multiple schools. I already know some WL that do this and it is a pain if the schools aren’t on the same bell schedule. MCEA needs to be proactive and include bargaining for traveling teachers in the next contract negotiations. For example, should traveling teachers get an extra planning period to account driving between schools?[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics