Reply to VA SCOTUS oral arguments

Forum Index » Metropolitan DC Local Politics

Reply to "VA SCOTUS oral arguments"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Question:  why wouldn't Spanberger allow for the maps to be posted at the polls?[/quote]

Why didn’t Trump release the Epstein files?[/quote]

The map couldn't be posted because it's not certain that will be the final result. If the referendum passes, we will see an 11-0 map appear. [/quote]

Given what’s happening in red states we’ll take however many seats we can. 
[/quote]

When will VA SC rule?[/quote]

[twitter]https://x.com/cvillebubble/status/2050292653586092125?s=46&t=R0sFrGNc8GH_7llJGM-81g[/twitter][/quote]

If they don't certify in time, it will be another court case. What a bunch of idiots. [/quote]

And if the court rules in favor of the Dems, there will still be another court case.  The SCOVA has not yet heard arguments on the wording of the referendum. [/quote]

That's a dead end. Absolutely no one believes that one can succeed. Fair depends on your point of view. There's no such thing as neutral language in politics. [/quote]

You do know that Virginia’s constitution requires ballot language to be neutral?[/quote]

The average reading level in Virginia is seventh grade. Half of the voters couldn't understand the question, let alone any neutrality issues. Please don't misunderstand me, all ballot questions are well above the average voter's reading level. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics