Reply to Senator Kagan on Wootton: "I am not supporting the City of Rockville's proposal"

Forum Index » Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)

Reply to "Senator Kagan on Wootton: "I am not supporting the City of Rockville's proposal""

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]What is the City of Rockville's proposal?

Why does a Senator's support matter for a local decision? [/quote]

It doesn't matter. Senators have no say in it.[/quote]

She was clear the legislature funds a significant amount of MCPS.[/quote]
But they have no say in how boundaries are drawn, and she has no clue what's going on.  This is a local matter.[/quote]

This has to be Essie. This reeks of her narrow, dig-in-your-heels attitude. You fail to understand the landscape if you're limiting the impact and influence of the politics that shape MCPS to just the school board and superintendent.[/quote]
? No. I'm a parent.  Why do some posters assume that all parents are against H, and only MCPS is for H?  You live in a bubble.  Sorry to burst it.[/quote]

I know there are parents for and against H.

It was the narrowing of influence and impact, and insisting WHO had decision making power that reeked of Essie, who routinely dismisses and rejects anyone other than MCPS influencing and impacting the system's decision making.

And frankly, I don't see why a parent would be focused on that. So either you're Essie or another staffer who wants to insist in MCPS supremacy, over community or other stakeholder feedback.[/quote]

MCPS admin pretending to be parent. Essie remembers when Roland used that trick, but remember he got caught![/quote]
I don't even know who is Essie is. You people are truly living in a bubble.  I live in the RM cluster in Rockville.[/quote]

Then you pay zero attention to MCPS. Essie is Taylor’s #1 liar in chief.[/quote]

You might want to step back and take a breath.  I'm not the PP, but I have been an involved parent in MCPS for over 15 years.  I pay attention.  And the first time I heard of this Essie person is on this thread.[/quote]

LOL but never heard of chief of staff = not paying attention[/quote]

Name the Chief of staff for any of your senators or representatives without looking it up.  I dare you. How about your county council member? Your state senator?

You are absurd.[/quote]

They don’t send their chief of staff to sit in public meetings for them so they can hide.  Taylor does.  He sends Essie McGuire to Council meetings so he doesn’t have to show up and be accountable for his actions.  They don’t have their chief of staff answer questions at board meetings. They speak for themselves.  Taylor hides behind McGuire at board meetings. If you have been at all involved in MCPS you would know all this. [/quote]

:roll:

They split up things to cover many bases.  See also: Madaleno vis-a-vis Elrich.  State reps, whether senators or delegates, have nothing close to nearly as full a plate, and their attention to optional activity is highly variable, especially if not in a high leadership position.

Kagan's vice-chairmanship of EEE might barely qualify, and we really don't know how much she leans on her own staff for public interaction.  But that is almost beside the point, where the Madaleno comparator is sufficient.[/quote]

No comparison at all.  No one is paid anywhere close to what the MCPS is paid.  The person is being paid to show up and be present and take responsibility for MCPS.  Taylor is paid way too much to be hiding behind a social worker with zero educational background. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics