Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Relationship Discussion (non-explicit)
Reply to "Red Pill Incel vs Volunatary submissive males"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I don't fully agree. C*cks find pleasure in their partner receiving pleasure. That's completely antithesis to incels who see women as something for their pleasure only. [/quote] What if the woman in question receives pleasure from taking a nap?[/quote] Your trolling is neither original nor interesting. [/quote] I’m not really trolling. I just think it’s kind of ridiculous to imagine that every woman is just looking to have sex with some random dude she has never met before. This is what the “cucks” and “incels” have in common. [b]You think that women are out there, prowling around, looking to have sex with any guy who isn’t you[/b]. And that the fact that women aren’t sleeping with you is some kind of evidence of your own weakness or inability to measure up to some man who is richer or stronger or has a bigger penis. [/quote] As has already been explained to you, they have nothing in common. Your premise, bolded, is fundamentally wrong. The female counterpart to a cuckold is called a "hotwife." Again, this is a pornography genre/construct. It's not some widespread phenomenon IRL. It's not even a limited phenomenon. It's not even a thing. But even your understanding of the pornographic fetish and the dynamic is wrong -- it isn't based on women "prowling around, looking to have sex with any guy who isn't you." It's a consensual arrangement with her partner and the activity is intended to be mutually satisfying. But, again, this isn't something that happens IRL. Incels, on the other hand, are very real. They're a particular kind of loser. And they're very angry about it. You're comparing apples to wheelbarrows. [/quote] I'm not saying that 1/100 people are in these relationship dynamics, but its far more common IRL than you are giving credit to. One survey of 4,000 men conducted by the Kinsey Institute researcher and social psychologist Justin Lehmiller, Ph.D., found 58% of men had fantasies about sharing their partner with other men. That is only speaking to the fantasy portion. This is not conversation people IRL are having with you, but they are having these conversations. There is also dating apps directed more specifically to this. Like 'Feeld'. Go ahead and see whose in your area and you might be surprised. [/quote] No, I'm not going to go look at degenerate dating sites. Your obsession with this is bizarre. It's not actually a thing. It's not 1 in 100. It might be more like 1 in 100,000. And probably less than that.[/quote] 1/100,000 = 700ish people. It's more like 7000. 1/10,000[/quote] I think I know why you can't get laid, anyway. [/quote] Feel free to project.[/quote] More of your conversation would infect my brain, you three-inch fool. [/quote] Oh no, if this conversation continues your scared you'll become a cuck? Now your just projecting your fragility.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics