Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Jobs and Careers
Reply to "Realignment for SEC"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]This Chairman is extremely indecisive. The rumors of realignment is just that - rumors. The point to all this madness is to actually not do any meaningful work. There is still no GC. A judge with no securities law background as its ENF director. An acting director in Exams with no securities law background either. The morale is low. More people have been checking out. [/quote] Ok let's not malign Paul here, he is doing a lot of very important work like making Merry Christmas videos on behalf of the SEC. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pFWxvAePwpY[/quote] Maybe I’m the only one here, but I appreciated his statements of appreciation and support of the staff. After so much public bashing by Elon and others, it’s nice to have a leader express something positive. Maybe my bar has been lowered too far but that was my thought after watching this.[/quote] If he supported the staff at all, he’d sign off on the minimal telework proposal that has been proposed and is awaiting his approval (or more likely, denial).[/quote] I think the likelihood of that happening is even lower now with what OPM just put out re telework. [/quote] I agree- I can't see where regular telework will be anywhere in our future. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics