Reply to Jesus' Historicity

Forum Index » Religion

Reply to "Jesus' Historicity"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous]Across secular, Jewish, Christian, agnostic, and atheist historians, the consensus is extremely consistent:

Jesus of Nazareth existed as a historical person.

This is held by:
	•	Marcus Borg (agnostic)
	•	Bart Ehrman (atheist/agnostic New Testament critic)
	•	Maurice Casey (agnostic)
	•	E.P. Sanders (agnostic)
	•	Geza Vermes (Jewish scholar)
	•	Paula Fredriksen (Jewish historian)
	•	John P. Meier (Catholic historian)
	•	Even Roman historians like Michael Grant, who had no religious investment

Their reasoning is based on:
	•	Multiple independent sources (Paul’s letters, Mark, Q-like early material)
	•	Embarrassing details unlikely to be invented (e.g., Jesus being executed as a criminal)
	•	External confirmation (Tacitus, Josephus with some interpolation debated, early rabbinic comments)
	•	The rapid rise of a movement centered on a known individual

These historians disagree wildly on miracles, theology, and the divinity of Jesus—but they agree he existed as a real figure.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics