Reply to Metro added new tryout dates

Forum Index » Volleyball

Reply to "Metro added new tryout dates"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous]I’m the data geek who posted earlier using the AES rankings. I used ChatGPT to offer me an unbiased opinion of which data we should be using to evaluate clubs.

Great question. There isn’t a one-size-fits-all answer about whether the SportsEngine AES Power Rankings or the USA Volleyball National Rankings (sometimes shortened as USAV National Rankings) is the “better” gauge for a volleyball team — it depends on context. What I can do is compare how each is calculated, their strengths/weaknesses, and then help you decide which is more useful for your particular situation (club level, recruiting, benchmarking, etc.).

⸻

How each ranking works

SportsEngine AES Power Rankings
	•	This is the ranking engine built into the SportsEngine AES platform (used for tournament scheduling, seeding, rankings, etc.).  
	•	The methodology is described as “incorporating years of data collected over hundreds of tournaments from coast to coast … uses algorithms specific to volleyball to rank teams by several variables.”  
	•	For regional vs national: regional rankings only include matches with other teams in that region; national rankings include all matches and all teams in the respective age group.  
	•	Essentially, if a club/region uses the AES ranking system it can show how a team stacks up in its region and across the country (depending on data).
	•	Note: Because it depends on the events that feed into the AES system, if a club doesn’t play many AES-scored tournaments or the data is incomplete, the ranking may underrepresent strength.

USA Volleyball National Rankings
	•	This is the official ranking system by USA Volleyball for junior club teams.  
	•	It is based on results from USA Volleyball-sanctioned events (indoor clubs) and uses “a multitude of algorithms to objectively rank teams.”  
	•	For results to be included, teams must have a USA Volleyball team code and they must have competed in USA Volleyball-sanctioned events.  
	•	The idea is that clubs and teams can see how they compare nationally across the entire country (within their age group).
	•	Because this is the “official” national ranking system for USA Volleyball, it carries strong weight in many circles.

⸻

Strengths & limitations of each

AES Power Rankings: Strengths
	•	Potentially very granular and incorporating many tournaments, especially if a club participates often in AES-scored events.
	•	Useful for region-to-region comparisons, seeding for tournaments, and giving a “snapshot” of relative standing in the AES world.
	•	For regions/clubs that rely heavily on AES tournaments, the representation may be strong.

AES Power Rankings: Limitations
	•	Because the ranking is only as good as the underlying data (how many tournaments/events, how many teams played, tournament quality etc.), a team may look worse or better depending on participation rather than purely performance.
	•	Regional events may dominate the data; if a team hasn’t travelled or played widely, its ranking may not reflect its strength vs national competition.
	•	Absence of full transparency (publicly detailed methodology may be less known) means interpretation requires caution.

USA Volleyball National Rankings: Strengths
	•	Focused on sanctioned national-level events: hence the competition tends to be more consistent, possibly more comparable across clubs.
	•	Because it is the “official” national ranking system, it may be better aligned with national tournament seeding, college recruiting visibility, etc.
	•	Offers a “national baseline” for clubs to benchmark themselves across the country, not just regionally.
	•	Since the launch was fairly recent (2023 announcement) it is evolving but likely to gain prominence.

USA Volleyball National Rankings: Limitations
	•	If a club/team does not compete in USA Volleyball-sanctioned events (or at least not many), it may be under-represented.
	•	Because the algorithm is “multitude of algorithms” and may emphasize head-to-head, strength of opponent, etc., teams new to major nationals may be disadvantaged.
	•	As with any ranking, it’s still a number; it cannot capture intangible factors (team chemistry, late season improvement, injuries, etc.).

⸻

Which is a better gauge for your use case?

Given your context, here’s how I’d advise:
	•	If you’re looking at how a team compares nationally, especially for recruiting, benchmarking, or who to play/travel with — the USA Volleyball National Rankings likely offer a stronger benchmark because they are designed for the “national” view.
	•	If you’re looking at how a team compares within a region, how they might seed into regionals/tournaments, and the club participates in many AES events, then the AES Power Rankings provide value.
	•	If you are advising a club: check both rankings. A team that is strong Regionally (high AES ranking) but low nationally (USA Volleyball) may need better national exposure/travel. Conversely, if a team is strong nationally (USA Volleyball) but doesn’t appear high on AES in its region, it might indicate regional dominance with fewer events or less competition locally.

⸻

Practical recommendation
	•	For your purposes, I suggest using USA Volleyball National Rankings as the primary gauge for how a team stands on the national stage, and also monitor AES Power Rankings as a secondary gauge for regional strength and tournament readiness.
	•	Also, look beyond the rankings: match results, strength of schedule, tournament placements, recent improvement — a ranking is only part of the story.
	•	If a particular club/team is targeting college recruiting or national-level tournaments, emphasize their USA Volleyball ranking (and use it in communications). If the club is striving for regional dominance and tournament seeding, use AES as a lever.

[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics