Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)
Reply to "Interview of MCPS program analysis leaders"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Whoa. Jeannie Franklin admitted that schools with existing programs won't get any new staff or resources. Instead, the bulk of new resources will go to schools getting magnets for the first time, which means Wooton, Churchill, WJ, and BCC. [/quote] BCC is not getting a magnet for the first time. Or rather, the IB program that already exists is just going to become the "magnet". [/quote] It will need more teachers[/quote] I thought none of the programs are getting new teachers, just perhaps some extra training.[/quote] If they don't change BCC boundaries but put in a new criteria based program that adds 200 students from other schools, their staff allocation will increase and other schools' staff allocations decrease.[/quote] They assume that the numbers of students entering and leaving schools for magnets will be roughly equal. [/quote] That is a preposterous assumption.[/quote] Well, yes. But this is MCPS. Preposterous is their operating philosophy. [/quote] I think they know they are lying. If they really believed it then it would be ridiculous for them to say the program model is "inextricably linked" with the boundary studies.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics