Reply to New and larger homes in old neighborhoods inside the beltway

Forum Index » Real Estate

Reply to "New and larger homes in old neighborhoods inside the beltway"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I don't care about these neighborhoods but: yes, I want a house with a smaller footprint and less square footage. I do think you have to update the layouts because houses built in the 1930s or 50s don't make sense for the way we live now. But that doesn't mean you have to supersize everything.

My ideal house would be around 2000 sq ft, with 3 bedrooms and 2.5 bathrooms. The bedrooms and bathrooms do not need to be huge, and I prefer an efficiently and intelligently laid out kitchen to some massive space with a huge island. I like built in storage and houses with nooks and alcoves that can be used for reading or working without dedicating entire rooms to it.

Smaller homes are easier to take care of. I also don't want or need a huge yard and would prefer a smaller lot with a patio for outdoor dining and space for some plantings or a garden rather than an expanse of yard. I don't need space that will encourage me to accumulate more and more stuff.

We have friends whoa re in these massive 5k and up new builds and to be honest they always feel empty and strange. I think they are hard to furnish because they require a lot of furniture to make them feel full, but also they are all open plan so people stress over furniture going together and also a lot of the rooms in the main living spaces don't have a ton of wall space for storage or TVs, so it's a challenge. Yes there is more room for kids, but also that means often your kids are off in some distant part of the house -- sometimes it would be nice if they were just in the next room or at least within earshot.

I truly don't understand the appeal of these homes. They are built to meet a social media aesthetic that I think is divorced from how it actually feels to live there. Great for TikTok dances, but not much else.[/quote]

Move and/or live in a townhouse. Regardless, you are in the minority or the homes would not be selling. The market determines what people will buy. [/quote]

What a weird aggressive response. People are allowed to have different  opinions and explain them reasonably.

I am not that PP but I agree with them.  And the point is that developers build the houses that will bring them the mosy profit. There certainly is a market for 2-3k sq ft houses that aren’t quite as expensive.

The 6k sq ft houses are ridiculous imo— even the real estate agents struggle to explain what the point of those extra rooms are. And suggesting it’s easier to clean a 6k sq ft house than a 2k sq ft house is also ridiculous [/quote]

I assume you have never actually lived in a larger house and you can't afford one.  :) [/quote]
This, lol. People who claim to like small houses are dealing with copium for not being able to afford a large one.

Large and new is better in every single way. Recently sold my dental practice and purchased a palatial estate in Potomac and I’m never looking back. [/quote].

Unpopular opinion here, but I really dont’ want a super big house.  We added on to our rambler and now have 3000 sq feet and that seems perfect.  With tweens and teens, I don’t want a house that they can get lost in. They still need monitoring, not a roommate situation where they have their own suite.  Being a little physically on top of each other means we have more interactions than you do in a cavernous new build.

[/quote]
3k sq ft still seems like a lot, does that include basement space?[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics