Reply to Does the MCPS proposal for zero additional teachers at programs hold water?

Forum Index » Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)

Reply to "Does the MCPS proposal for zero additional teachers at programs hold water?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I'm not very familiar with how high school staffing works or with the details of the qualifications needed to teach in the various programs MCPS is proposing, so although it doesn't seem right to me, I would love to hear from folks who understand this better.

MCPS is saying there will not be any extra staffing for any of these programs (except for one program coordinator per school covering all programs at that school), and that the teachers will just come out of the regular staffing allocations at each high school. They have also said that the new programs will phase in so that teachers would only be teaching the program classes to 9th graders the first year, 9th and 10th the second, etc.

Does that seem like it will work?   Do schools already have the staff needed to teach most or all of these classes, and will they have enough space in their schedules to add the new program classes without decreasing access to classes for non-program students?  Will this still be true at schools that lose a lot of their staff due to drops in enrollment after the boundary changes? (I believe high schools lose about 4 teachers for every 100 students they lose?)

Or are any of the classes for the programs specialized enough that some schools may not already have the staff needed to teach them, and if so, how would they find the space in the staffing budget to add new teachers?  Are there non-program classes they could cut to make this work?  Would these specialized teachers be able to take over other standard classes for non-program students to make a full schedule, or would they need to hire these teachers at a 0.2 or 0.4 the first year and slowly build up (and would teachers be OK with that)?

The proposed classes for the various programs are here (pages 37-86), for reference: https://go.boarddocs.com/mabe/mcpsmd/Board.nsf/files/DMJHXR4AA9BD/$file/Boundary%20Studies%20Program%20Analysis%20Update%20251016%20PPT%20REV.pdf[/quote]
No new staffing means the total number of teachers in the school (and in the district) isn’t going to increase. It doesn’t mean there won’t be any shifting around of teachers.

There are already more highly qualified teachers to teach advanced courses in each school than there are sections of advanced courses. The majority of classes in the program shifts can be covered. Some specialty classes may need teachers to also move, especially if the entire program moves. For example, [b]when they shifted the upcounty MS humanities magnet from Clemente to MLK, they rolled it up by grade level and the existing teachers in the program were given the option to transfer with the program. Some did, some didn’t. [/b]

[/quote]

And it did a lot of damage to the program, which isn’t as robust as it’s Eastern counterpart.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics