Reply to Are you delaying Retirement so your Adult Children can have medical coverage?

Forum Index » Adult Children

Reply to "Are you delaying Retirement so your Adult Children can have medical coverage? "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]OP however my older kids have jobs however, it is expensive out of their paycheck and "technically" free for me as I have to have the family plan was my wife and kid in college is on it anyhow. I have medical, dental and vision for five people on plan.

If I quit my two oldest would go on their work plan, my one in college I guess some type of bare bone college plan (but I would end up paying the policy plus who knows if she even would have dental or vision coverage).

It is like a crazy domino effect.

And [b]I don't think it is crazy in US my insurance is tied to my job. [/b]I do think having kids ands spouses dependent on it and something they cant control is crazy.  [/quote]

Why do you think it's reasonable?

Should access to education also be tied to W-2 employment?[/quote]

Ny personal insurance. I think it is crazy a Dad with a SAHM and three kids he loses his job the wife and kids also lose health insurance. It also sucks in divorce or death for spouse and kids if one parent is sole source of health insurance.

And yes, my prior company I worked at was a young hip start up. I say 40 percent of company under 26 and single. Most people could care less about are medical insurance plans. Pretty cheap for company if 40 percent of company dont sign up for medical.    [/quote]

I guess I agree with you, but I'm also a capitalist at heart and don't want to pay for the whole country's insurance via increased taxes.  I could get on board with a health care system that people buy into that is not tied to employment. [/quote]

Do you view healthcare as a consumer product and not a basic entitlement (like education, clean water, paved streets)?[/quote]

I view [b]basic, lifesaving healthcare as something we should provide to all, but I don't view full health care as an entitlement. [/b]I understand it's more nuanced than that, but at the core, I don't want to pay more taxes to insure someone else's 25-year-old.[/quote]
dp.. so you think people should have emergency care covered but not preventative basic care, like physicals?

That's so bassackward.  Insurance companies cover 100%  preventative care because that's a lot cheaper than paying for stage 3 or 4 cancer treatments, for example.  My mammograms are covered 100%.  I have a family history of breast cancer.  It would behoove the insurance company to pay for semiannual mammo and MRI rather than surgery and chemo, which is ridiculously expensive.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics