Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Real Estate
Reply to "What exactly is wrong with the mcmansion? "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I dislike them because they tend to be architecturally bleak. I've always liked old buildings and old houses that have lots of details like wainscoting, crown moldings, interesting doorway shapes, unusual windows (that suit the style of the house), built-ins, etc. The houses that fall into traditional "mcmansion" definition are big without having character. they put showy details (palladian windows, etc.) on facades that shouldn't have them, and try to impress with quantity instead of quality. [b] And honestly, I don't see why a small family would need so much space. it's really wasteful, environmentally speaking, to pay to heat and cool (and furnish and clean) all that extra space when 2,000 SF would probably be just fine for most families.[/b] Plus it irritates me when someone puts a 5,000 SF house on a 6,000 SF lot, so there's no yard left over and the house looms over the neighbors. Save the giant houses for giant lots. Not jealous. If I sold my $600K arlington house, I could buy a mcmansion (or two) in an outlying suburb. Never. Gonna. Happen.[/quote] Average number of kids in the fifties was 3.8 (from Wikipedia), down to about 2.1 now. We entertain less now, too. So a large part of our enormous house size is just to house our things.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics