Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Reply to "Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]Interesting, the letter is addressed to Geragos, so that's what he was doing for JV, trying to sue (it seems like, since the letter reminds him his contract calls for arbitration) DM for retaliation after allegedly forcing him to commit perjury in his first declaration. And in this new declaration he says that while the first statement was technically true, it omitted context. It kind of feels like Freedman got to him, via Geragos, and tried to get him to flip and renounce the first declaration. But then the Lively and Sloane side got him to flip back, switch attorneys, and support his first declaration and even make a stronger one in support of Sloane. It was obvious how both Lively and Sloane immediately pounced on it and it just happened to drop the day Wayfarer was supposed to respond to Liman's request. But he does seem consistent in his claim that he made it clear Sloane didn't say SA, which is a problem for Freedman. It's all so messy.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
