Reply to How Princeton is Getting Around the Endowment Tax

Forum Index » College and University Discussion

Reply to "How Princeton is Getting Around the Endowment Tax"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Seems like a win for everyone!
[/quote]

Seems like it makes the endowment tax arbitrary stupid nonsense.  Don't tax Princeton but tax MIT.  Don't text Amherst or NYU but tax Notre Dame.  This whole thing just seems pointless.[/quote]

It is a Pigovian tax. It wasn’t intended to raise revenue. This is an optimal outcome, perhaps even an intended one. [/quote]

It’s kind of crappy to be a family who makes just a tad over the line (or who have more than typical assets) who will pay full price while others just a tiny bit under the line pay none. I get the rationale but it’s not optimal from that perspective. [/quote]

Totally agree - this system is very binary - all or nothing. There will be a lot of gamesmanship among families to get below the line - ironically people will have an incentive to take a pay cut for a few years. It makes very little sense yet given the constraints Princeton is dealing with, I don't blame them. But as one who is not far over the line and also had the audacity to live somewhat conservatively and save money for college, it is frustrating. But life isn't fair - I'm fortunate to have more than most other Americans and college is not a God-given right.[/quote]

This is wrong.  It is not binary but a sliding scale   but Princeton is in a position to be generous.

But are you seriously saying " life is not fair" because you are unhappy with your financial aid award at Princeton?    Are you the same poster that was so "squeezed"  a college even though they had a car on campus and could only "occasionally" go out to a show?  Some of you all are seriously in a bubble.[/quote]

What have you seen suggesting it’s a sliding scale? It seems like kids with aid got a lot more aid (so they aren’t counted as tuition payers) and kids with no aid continued to get no aid. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics