Reply to Metro vs Paramount (vs other top clubs)

Forum Index » Volleyball

Reply to "Metro vs Paramount (vs other top clubs)"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]
2025 16-2: 900 (added 8 players, kept 5)
2024 15-2: 1100
2025 15-2: 530 (added 6 players, kept 8)
2024 14-2: 388
2025 14-2: 478 (added 9 players, kept 5)
2024 13-2: 596

You'll find the a similar trend in the 1s team data:
2025 17-1: 179 (added 3, kept 11)
[b]2024 16-1: 86[/b]
2025 16-1: 39  (added 6, kept 7)
2024 15-1: 50 
2025 15-1: 116 (added 7, kept 7)
2024 14-1: 319
2025 14-1: 96 (added 9, kept 6)
2024 13-1: 211
2025 13-1: 142 (added 7, kept 4)
2024 12-1: 196 
[/quote]
I believe you have one number wrong. In 2024 Paramount 16-1 was ranked 275 (not 86). That means using your methodology, the 2024 16-1 team (275) improved in 2025 as 17-1 (179), not declined as you claim.

[quote=Anonymous]
In national ranking, the Paramount 2s teams that added more players than they kept performed better the next year. The one team that kept more players than it added performed worse. [b]The 15-2s team that showed the performance improvement year over year in your regional data was actually the only team to decline in national rank.[/b]
[/quote]
You claim that the following numbers show that the more Paramount kept its players the worse the team performed in the next year:
2025 15-2: 530 (added 6 players, kept 8)
2024 14-2: 388

If you talk about a team going from 10 to 20 (a top team), that may be meaningful, but you are talking about 388 in 2024 to 530 in 2025. We don't know how many teams were inserted or deleted between 388 and 530, and we don't know whether the algorithms changed from 2024 to 2025. A slight change in algorithms can make a hugh difference for lower ranked teams.

When I look at the national ranks translated to relative ranks in the region, I see that this team improved in local ranks from 11 to 7 even though the national ranks declined from 388 to 531. 
2025 15-2: 7
2024 14-2: 11

2023-4
46 Metro 14 Travel
193 Blue Ridge 14 Blue
197 Columbia 14 Black
306 MVSA 14 Force
309 LEVBC U14 National
319 Paramount VBC 14 Maureen
323 Delaware United 14 Navy
336 VA Juniors 14 Elite
337 MOCO Magic
365 Metro 14 South PW
388 Paramount VBC 14 Cozad

2024-5
25 Metro 15 Travel
116 Paramount VBC 15 Maureen
146 Blue Ridge 15 Blue
298 MVSA 15 Charge
406 VA Juniors 15 Elite
497 BRYC 15 Royal
531 Paramount VBC 15 Cruz

Furthermore, the 15-2 team just earned a National bid this year. And you are talking about [b]"The 15-2s team that showed the performance improvement year over year in your regional data was actually the only team to decline in national rank."[/b] Getting a National bid as a second team is not good enough for you?

You drew a lot of conclusions that are not supported by data. I'm giving you two rebuttals for now.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics