Reply to EPA Head Zeldin on "Ruthless" podcast

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "EPA Head Zeldin on "Ruthless" podcast"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Climate change is a theory. It's not a fact. People arent obligated to go all in on your theories to give up air conditioning and eat bugs so that cows stop farting. [/quote]

[b]It’s the only theory that hasn’t been proven wrong.[/b]  The only people that benefit from climate science denialism are the fossil fuel industry and real estate industry. Everyone else loses.  20% of humanity across the globe may have to move away from coastal areas due to the changes occurring.

Of course, this denialism is basically a requirement to be a Republican now.[/quote]

You'd be stunned how many theories have been proven wrong.

In 20 years, no one will talk about climate change anymore. There's a reason your leftist overlords have stopped talking about it. They used it to make everyone nod along while they handed out money to make windmills and solar farms that we pretend are better for the environment than other energy generation sources. But now that it's crystal clear that we won't have enough energy in the future, they suddenly dont talk about climate change or green energy. They know they radicalized democrats with that Al Gore documentary and can't tell you its over, but its over. "Genocide" is the new "climate change," get with the program comrade. [/quote]

Let's break your mountain of drooling tripe down:

Climate change isn’t a fringe hypothesis, it’s a rigorously tested framework supported by over a century of data, satellite measurements, and peer-reviewed research. The term "theory" in science means a comprehensive explanation, not a wild shot-in-the-dark guess.

The idea that "no one talks about it anymore" is absolutely laughable. Climate change is front and center in global policy, economics, insurance risk modeling, military threat assessments, and disaster response planning. If anything, it’s louder than ever.

Wind and solar are outperforming expectations. They’re now the cheapest sources of new electricity in many regions, and they’re scaling faster than fossil fuels ever did. Pretending they’re a scam ignores the economic data and global investment trends.

Energy shortages? That’s a grid planning issue, not a failure of renewables. Fossil fuel volatility and climate-driven disasters are the real threats to energy security.

Al Gore didn’t radicalize anyone, he amplified what scientists had already been warning. The IPCC was founded in 1988, not by Hollywood, but by the UN and the World Meteorological Organization.

And your dippy "eat bugs" and "genocide is the new climate change" lines? They're not just stupid and tasteless, it’s a grotesque attempt to derail serious discourse with shock-jock nonsense.[/quote]

1) I stand by my prediction that climate change will not be talked about in 20 years. It will slowly recede into the background, the way that concern about the ozone layer is no longer a discussion point. These days, most kids dont know what an ozone layer is. Climate change will go the same way. This is already happening: https://www.monmouth.edu/polling-institute/reports/monmouthpoll_us_050624/.  Pew and others show the same trend. There's a reason politicals on the left aren't talking about.

2) the grid is a distribution system, not a generation system. It can only distribute energy that has been generated. So concerns about having enough energy cannot be addressed by grid upgrades. They can only be addressed by increasing energy capacity. I have no idea what you even mean about fossil fuel volatility and climate change disasters being the real threat to energy security. You can't power our country on unicorn farts. You have to have generation sources and we don't have enough because we've spent the past 20 years throwing all our cash at inefficient systems like solar.

3) I wouldn't have to talk about eating bugs if the left would stop pushing it. The left has serious concerns about cow-ass emissions that can be reduced if more people take on plant based diets. Fair enough, but then they went further and now argue we should eat bugs. No thanks, I am sticking to deer meat.

[/quote]

The ozone layer was fixed because governments worldwide banned the use of CFC’s. We don’t talk an out it because it was solved. That’s what we want to do with fossil fuel emissions. You are so uninformed. Please educate yourself so that you aren’t just arguing out of ignorance. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics