Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
College and University Discussion
Reply to "Pomona vs Williams ED for Chemistry/Neuroscience"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Just curious - how much exposure does she have to neuroscience? That seems like a pretty narrow focus. A semester? A summer internship? Particularly because they are both SLACs, I would not factor the neuroscience part much into the equation. Where do you live? Which campus seems like a better fit? I know Williams fairly well and very little about Pomona except a somewhat odd acquaintance in their 50s who went there (and I am wise enough not to let that influence my opinion). They seem like pretty different places other than size and prestige.[/quote] In many ways they're pretty similar. Top LACs known for their good financial aid, diversity, high quality math departments, interest in global engagement (Pomona and Williams both currently have a Global emphasis in their strategic plans, Pomona has the Cambridge Program and Downing Scholars, Williams has WEPO and Oxford fellowships), both have a pretty big outdoors community/focus. The differences are mostly tutorial versus consortium, but the similarities are very much there, because Pomona, in general, is modeled after a New England college. I don't really think neuro is that narrow. It's a field that intersects computer science, statistics, biology, chemistry, and mathematics. It's a bit of a juiced up biology degree. [/quote] My question is how much does she truly know about neuroscience? Assuming she finished her junior year of HS, she was likely largely taking core type classes - Bio, Chem and Physics, English, History, Language, the usual math sequence, etc. So I don't know how much exposure she would have to something like that. Perhaps someone with an interest might have gotten a semester or so of it junior year, and then will take it senior year. Both schools are very national, but I think Williams draws more heavily from the east coast, while Pomona more from the west, and that is where most kids end up. Their names are strong enough that you can end up wherever you want, but there might not be a ton of other alums there. Williams is also more isolated. There just is not much there. Which has its pros and cons. My kid is OK with that, particularly because they love skiing so will take advantage of it. Many others would find it limiting. Pomona is less isolated.[/quote] She has competed and received awards from the national brain bee, does volunteering with Alzheimers patients, and is pretty active/leads the psych club at school. Getting a summer internship is pretty unheard of for a high school student, so she hasn't done that. I don't see why we wouldn't factor in the neuroscience, since it is not beyond a liberal arts college to have a subject inside the liberal arts. We live outside of Boston. Once again, we found the campus comparisons unfair since it was a shining perfect day in Claremont when we visited, and we don't want to rush to assumptions because it was nice for one day. Both seemed pretty isolating to us, but obviously Pomona is a bit more connected with access to LA. For other posters, we were pretty underwhelmed by Amherst and DD really didn't enjoy the campus aesthetic nor did we like any of the students/faculty we talked with. Seemed like an alright place, but it isn't a good match for DD. Swarthmore is a bit too academically focused that it seems suffocating to be in for four years.[/quote] NP: If she is that hard core for a specific scientific discipline, a SLAC might not be right for her as it isn't as research focused. You generally choose a SLAC for the overall product, not a specific area - that is the point of a liberal arts education. Obviously SLACs are a great overall experience and many go on from them to do PhD's in sciences, but the nuanced details of the science departments are irrelevant. Sounds like she has done some great things - congrats. It is a big difference between going to school a fairly short drive from home vs. cross country. Obviously lots of pros and cons. But helpful to know you are outside Boston.[/quote] For what it's worth, ours chose Pomona because of the physics program specifically. He has had an amazing time and still adores the physics major and has not been let down by research opportunities. With LACs, it's good to compare departments, because some departments are occasionally underfunded or undersupported if not enough students have interest. Also I think the entire 5C model kinda disproves this. You go to Mudd because you want to do STEM, you go to Pitzer because you have an interest in the environment, organizing, or social institutions, you go to CMC because you have an interest in economics, government, or philosophy. You can be hard core interested in something, and still have other coursework. For example, DS took classes in religious studies and German, because they were still of interest. Students still come into LACs with some working idea of their interests.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics