Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Supreme Court MoCo Ruling"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Honest question here because I am well versed in the law as it relates to this decision. Does this mean that a Holocaust-denying familiy can opt their high school student out of a history class unit on the Holocaust? As a former HS history teacher, this frightens me. A lot. What do we do with that student over the several weeks of study of this topic? It is not one book or a one-day lesson plan. I guess they go to study hall and read military history books about WWII??? What about evolution? That's another one where families may want to opt out. This will turn into a logistical nightmare for the schools and teachers. [/quote] Yes, you are right. Sotomayor's dissent is along these lines. It is puzzling that in the past, religious parents have failed when they tried to use free exercise as an excuse to get their kids opted out of classes that taught evolutionary theory, that taught about women who have achieved success outside the home, and that read stories about wizards and imaginary animals. But with this massive expansion of Yoder, there is a good chance that parents can choose to have their kids opt out of a lot of instruction based on religious beliefs.[/quote] And yes, it will be a logistical nightmare, especially for teachers of younger children who need direct supervision during opt outs.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics