Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
College and University Discussion
Reply to "Restrictions on Harvard"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]The judge said, "I want to make sure it’s worded in such a way that nothing changes.” Sounds result-oriented rather than based in an analysis of the law.[/quote] Sounds reasonable to word it carefully. I think responsible people in this country would like to step up and try to halt the constant drain on our energy and resources that is coming from this corrupt wasteful inefficient amateur administration.[/quote] Right. The judge needs to word the injunction order carefully because we’ve already seen this administration will parse words and look for loopholes to refuse to comply. A preliminary injunction is intended to preserve the status quo and not allow changes while the litigation is pending. The statement from the judge is a reflection of that, not some improper conspiracy theory (or whatever you’re trying to suggest).[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
