Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Metropolitan DC Local Politics
Reply to "Break Up Fairfax County and other DC Metro counties. "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Greatly increase the county legislative reps & BOE seats to make them more individually/local-communuty responsive. Make planning boards similarly elected instead of appointed. Get rid of at-large seats which only reinforce majority hegemony. Elect them every 2 years. Pay these elected reps well enough to make the job full time at a reasonably professional level. Counter the increased cost of their salaries with lower allocations for legislative staff, since they wouldn't need as much outreach support to cover their smaller constituencies. Force the above with ballot initiatives. Side benefit: special interests that end up with outsized influence from their campaign contributions would see that influence diluted. [/quote] Yeah, and guess what happens, more boards, more councils, etc etc after breakups mean more pols. More pols mean more govt salaries and lifetime pensions and retirement healthcare plans you now have to fund. That means a doubling, tripling, or quadrupling of propety taxes and local taxes/fees. You people never learn lessons from what has already been done before...aka New Jersey. I can't wait until this happens and then people piss and moan about $50, 60, 90, 100+ k property tax bills per year like NJ.[/quote] Not exactly. Don't balkanize into smaller districts. Still have one Board of Supervisors (or County Council), one BOE, etc., but have more members of each accountable to fewer. Don't allow seniority to confer, institutionally, greater power. More pols, yes, each with salaries, but lower than current for the county legislators (BOEs need bumps, though) and with lower numbers of staff (offsetting the increase in legislators), as they'd be expected to handle more direct interaction with constituents since the constituent-legislator ratio would be lower. And each pol would have less concentrated power. New Jersey, as another poster mentioned, followed the balkanized, town-by-town path. That's the one with more councils, etc.[/quote] Wishful thinking. The road to hell is paved with good intentions and the law of unintended consequences always takes over. Breaking up into smaller anything will absolutely end up in more councils, more schools, more police, more fire, more trash, more sewers, more public workers, and more pols. Taxes skyrocket in the end to pay for all of the salaries, pensions, and healthcare handouts. No thanks. NY and NJ are disasters of a tax burden specifically because they went down this rabbit hole. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics