Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)
Reply to "Could a new consortium make boundary changes more acceptable?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I think the special programs offered in these consortia give kids a chance to really shine and differentiate themselves for college applications. And it just gives them a reason to get excited to go to school in the morning. The more engaged they are, the better they will do. This is kind of like living and learning programs in college which may have nothing to do with your major but give a sense of community. Proven to be highly successful. Strongly in favor.[/quote] This is PP. but still not enough to make me like option 3. It’s just too much bussing and shifting the kids around. Make the boundaries based on equal weighting of four factors (as required under MCPS policy), then we can look at consortia/magnets to improve demographics. MCPS was successful at this in the past.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
