Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Jobs and Careers
Reply to "NYT: Judge Pauses RIF Plans "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I feel bad for people who took the DRP and VERA because they thought they would get RIFed.[/quote] I’ve been saying all this time that DRP only made sense if you were ready to retire or very sure you would get RIFed AND had the ability to find a new job quickly (eg young probationaries with options and no roots put down or a very disfavored job like OMWI). Or just confident in other options being available and no longer wanting to be a fed - these are mainly the younger folk and the leadership that can transition to a law firm easily (from my agency). Add to that the fact that DRP makes it hard to get or even seek a new job due to ethics issues and it all just seemed foolish unless you fall into one of those categories. For everyone else, riding it out has made more sense. My agency has not really acquitted itself that well during the transition, but at least it announced DRP 2 along with a statement that RIFs were not planned. So DRP and VERA are only being taken by those who can jump easily to new jobs or those close to retirement - and possibly a few who know they are on the Schedule F chopping block, but they tend to have more marketability too. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics