Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Off-Topic
Reply to "Expectation of Privacy in 'Public'"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]It's not illegal. There is no legal expectation of privacy in a public space. But it is super creepy to spy on the neighbors like that. Just because something is legal and easy doesn't make it a good choice. No damage or thievery, why even listen. That's intrusive. The Rivian owner reminds me of a kid who snooped for Christmas presents or read a friend's or sibling's diary. Now he lives with the consequences. If he starts trouble over it, I doubt most neighbors will take his side. Because they'll know he's creeping on them too. I had exterior cameras for a specific stalker related issue. I told my neighbors about them and I just fast forwarded through any neighbor content. [/quote] If it's a private lot is it a public space?[/quote] Lots of places that are privately owned are still considered “public” for the purposes of this. Restaurants and stores can be privately owned, our neighborhood pool and playground are privately owned. They are still in “public.”[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics